IntroductionWere you ever looking up papers in MathSciNet and you found one that especially made you smile or laugh? And were you ever wishing that MathReviews were sorted by amusement factor? Well, we did. In fact, it is a long-standing game among many mathematicians to find the most amusing or worst MathReviews they can.As a gesture of humanitarianism, I've compiled a list of what I take to be, for one reason or another, exceptional MathReviews of which I have been made aware. A review may merit listing by being unexpected, witty, scathing, humorous or otherwise deviating considerably from the run-of-the-mill reviews. It may be either good or bad, called for or uncalled for, but it should be in some way exceptional. This list is only possible with your support, so if you can suggest additions or would like to rate any reviews already listed, please email me. (Contributions will by default remain anonymous, but at contributors' requests, I am happy to add names to an acknowledgements section.) Contributions will be added chronologically, so look for newer additions at the end of the list. Enjoy! Note: To try to clean up the page some, the older entries as well as related material have been moved to linked pages. The classics (2006)The second season (2007)Opus No. 3 (2008)20092010Recent additionsAdded in 2011MR1127229 White on Rota Rating:![]()
MR0154814
Gillman on Bourbaki
Rating:
MR693167
Glass on Anellis
Rating:
MR2597696
Brink on Shamseddine and Berz
Rating:
MR2575275
Lovejoy on Gupta, Tabassum and Mathur
Rating:
MR2527469
Fernandez on Pandey
Rating:
MR0814389
Ishihara on Pandey and Kumar
Rating:
MR0416411
Lerche on Smith
Rating:
MR0072286
Erdelyi on Chakravarty
Rating:
MR0061037
Dyson on Petermann
Rating:
Added in 2013(I took a brief hiatus from updating this page in 2012. Apologies for proving theorems instead of keeping you up-to-the-moment in the exiciting world of Exceptional MathReviews.)
G. Turnwald
seems to find errors in 80% of what he reviews. Here is a sample:
MR0124005
Auslander on Benzercri
Rating:
MR1439623
McGovern on Hinich
Rating:
MR1917383
Francis on Perkins and Rowley
Rating:
MR0724490
Smorynski on Valentini
Rating:
MR1055283
Vanderbauwhede on Geurts
Rating:
MR2591149
Znojil on Lavagno
Rating:
MR0137828
and
MR0227394
Goodman on Koseki
Rating:
MR0116096,
MR0151602,
and
MR0151603
Wilf on Koseki
Rating:
MR0111043
and
MR0100842
Terasaka on Koseki
Rating:
MR1445293
Bottcher on Goldberg and Chen (in particular, the penultimate paragraph)
Rating:
Added in 2015MR1773562 Pirashvili on Berrick and Keating Rating:![]()
MR0150536
Herz on Hewitt and Stromberg (the review is shorter than this comment)
Rating:
MR3071623
Troubetzkoy on Beran and Celikovsky
Rating:
MR2303406
Corcoran and Hicks (2 reviewers!) on Goldstein
Rating:
MR0304101
Bavel on Koenig and Frederick
Rating:
MR2527469
Fernandez on Pandey
Rating:
MR1135530
Anonymous on Orevkov
Rating:
MR0125113
Barsotti on Shimura and Taniyama (last 2 sentences, mentioned in JS Milne's
tips)
Rating:
MR2604456
Katz on Krantz
Rating:
MR0312924
Weiss on Itoh
Rating:
MR0154641
Allcock on Tzou
Rating:
MR2661181
Gibson on Frenkel
Rating:
MR0376432
Read on D'Amore
Rating:
MR0107626
Cohn on Katz
Rating:
Added in 2020(Apologies to all who submitted reviews ages ago, but thanks to the COVID-19 pandemic, I am now more convinced than ever that maintain this page is the most important thing I can do for society.)
MR1612421
Poizat on Freedman
Rating:
MR3585691
Corcoran on Wagner
Rating:
MR0279280
Lohwater on Nevanlinna (look for an unusual word in the reviewer's remarks)
Rating:
MR1826251
Bonk on Gromov
Rating:
MR0574106/7
Fong on Budden (the reviewer's critique of the length is somewhat ironic)
Rating:
MR0977742
Marsden on Herman (esp 2nd paragraph)
Rating:
MR0785195
Kilov on Gorbatov, Pavlov and Chetverikov (esp last paragraph)
Rating:
MR0433805
De Matteis on Greenwood
Rating:
MR0412196
Reid on Tjurin (reviewer's remark)
Rating:
MR2945454
Freedman on Ahmedov and Najafov
Rating:
MR3241679
Lubarsky on Bell
Rating:
MR3519790
and the linked
MR2726369
Lubarsky on Dalla Chiara et al
Rating:
Exceptional reviews from other sources
Langlands' review of Euclid's Window
Mordell on
Lang (Diophantine Geometry), then
Lang back on Mordell (Diphantine Equations) (see also Lang's letter)
Rota's review of Recent Philosophers
Weil's review
of The mathematical career of Pierre de Fermat
Scanlon's review
of Stable groups
(the last 2 paragraphs)
Related materialFri Jun 12 16:42:38 CDT 2020 kimball.martin@ou.edu (home page) |