MATH 4433 - Introduction to Analysis I, Section 001
- Spring 2017
TR 10:30-11:45 a.m., 403 PHSC
Instructor:
Nikola Petrov, 802 PHSC, (405)325-4316, npetrov AT math.ou.edu.
Office Hours:
Monday 2:30-3:30, Wednesday 10:30-11:30, or by appointment, in 802 PHSC.
First day handout
Course catalog description:
Prerequisite: 2433 and 2513 or permission of instructor.
Review of real number system. Sequences of real numbers.
Topology of the real line. Continuity and differentiation
of functions of a single variable. (F, Sp, Su)
Texts:
All three books are feely available (in pdf format)
for OU students from the OU library:
Stephen Abbott,
Understanding Analysis,
Springer, 2nd ed., 2015, ISBN: 978-1493927111.
Kenneth A. Ross,
Elementary Analysis: The Theory of Calculus,
Springer, 2nd ed., 2013, ISBN: 978-1461462705.
Asuman G. Aksoy, Mohamed A. Khamsi,
A Problem Book in Real Analysis,
Springer, 2010, ISBN: 978-1441912954.
Homework [read the following useful
advice on writing proofs
and
advice from students]
-
Homework 1, due January 26 (Thursday).
-
Homework 2, due February 2 (Thursday).
-
Homework 3, due February 9 (Thursday).
-
Homework 4, due February 16 (Thursday).
-
Homework 5, due March 2 (Thursday).
-
Homework 6, due March 9 (Thursday).
-
Homework 7, due March 23 (Thursday).
-
Homework 7a, NOT
due March 28 (Tuesday).
-
Homework 8, due April 11 (Tuesday).
-
Homework 9, due April 18 (Tuesday).
-
Homework 10, due April 25 (Tuesday).
-
Homework 10a, NOT
due May 4 (Thursday).
Tentative course content:
- The real numbers:
natural numbers, induction; real numbers, ordering, completeness,
cardinality, Cantor's Theorem.
- Sequences and series:
convergence, limit theorems, monotone sequences,
subsequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem, Cauchy sequences;
infinite series.
- Topology of R:
the Cantor set, open and closed sets, compact sets.
- Limits and continuity:
limits of functions, continuous functions,
Intermediate Value Theorem, (uniform continuity).
- Differentiation:
derivative, Mean Value Theorem,
L'Hospital rule, Taylor's Theorem.
- Sequence and series of functions:
sequences of functions, uniform convergence and differentiation;
series of functions, power series, Taylor series.
- Integration:
Riemann integral, Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
Content of the lectures:
-
Lecture 1 (Tue, Jan 17):
Preliminaries:
set notations:
x∈A,
x∉A,
A⊆B,
A=B,
complement Ac of a set A,
union A∪B
and intersection A∩B
of the sets A and B,
relative complement
A∖B:=A∩(Bc)
of B in A,
de Morgan's laws;
B
sets of natural numbers N, integers Z,
rational numbers Q, real numbers R;
logic notations: negation ∼S of a statement S,
existential quantifier ∃,
universal quantifier ∀,
statement S implies statement R
(S⇒R),
statement S is equivalent to statement R
(S⇔R),
the contrapositive of S⇒R
is defined as ∼R⇒∼S;
proof by contradiction,
example of a proof by contradiction:
irrationality of the number 21/2.
Reading:
Aksoy, pages 1, 2;
Abbott, pages 1, 2.
FFT problems*:
Aksoy, problems 1.1, 1.8, 1.9
(on pages 4, 5, solved on pages 9-12).
* FFT ("Food For Thought") problems
are problems that you should be able to solve, but you do not have to turn in.
-
Lecture 2 (Thu, Jan 19):
Preliminaries (cont.):
more examples of proofs related to sets;
proving that
A⊆B iff A∪B=B
and that
A⊆B iff A∩B=A
(links to the solutions with blanks
and the
complete solutions);
definition of a function, domain and range of a function;
1-to-1 (injective), onto (surjective), and bijective functions;
examples (domains and ranges of the functions
ƒ(x)=x2,
ƒ(x)=ln(x),
ƒ(x)=[ln(x)]1/2);
a proof that
g(A∪B)=g(A)∪g(B);
proofs by induction.
Reading:
Abbott, pages 5-7, 10, 11;
Aksoy, pages 2, 3.
FFT problems:
Aksoy, problems 1.2, 1.7, 1.8, 1.17, 2.3, 2.5
(on pages 4, 5, 7, 22, 23, solved on pages 9, 11, 14, 15, 27-29).
Remark: in Problem 1.7, before trying to solve each part of the problem,
draw the corresponding Venn diagram to make sure
that the statement is reasonable.
The complete Homework 1 is due on January 26 (Thursday).
-
Lecture 3 (Tue, Jan 24):
Preliminaries (cont.):
Problem 1.8(a) on page 5, do part (b) yourselves,
note that part (a) can be solved in at least two more methods
(click here to see how);
more about sets: proving that
A∖B=(Ac)∖(Ac);
useful set identities:
A∪(B∩C)=(A∪B)∩(A∪C),
A∩(B∪C)=(A∩B)∪(A∩C)
(draw Venn diagrams);
set notations in R, example:
(0,3]c=(−∞,0]∪(3,∞);
on the example
ƒ:A→B with A=R, B=R
given by ƒ(x)=x2:
making ƒ surjective by decreasing B=R to B=[0,∞),
making ƒ injective by decreasing A=R to A=(−∞,0]
(or to A=[0,∞));
inverse function of the function g:(−∞,0]→[0,∞)
given by g(x)=x2:
g−1(y)=−y1/2;
inverse images of sets under a function are well-defined even if the function
is not invertible, example:
for ƒ:R→R given by ƒ(x)=x2,
ƒ−1((25,36])=[−6,−5)∪(5,6],
ƒ−1({−25})=∅,
while ƒ−1(−25) is not well-defined (why?).
Real numbers:
developing the concept of a number:
natural numbers N, integers Z,
rational numbers Q, real numbers R;
axioms of the real numbers - addition and multiplication
(click here).
Reading: Abbott, pages 13, 14.
FFT problems: Aksoy, problems 1.18, 2.3, 2.5 (on pages 7, 22, 23,
solved on pages 15, 27-29)
Hint on HW 1:
the function
ƒ:R→R given by ƒ(x)=x2
is convenient to construct counterexamples;
e.g., think fo examples when the inclusions
A⊆ƒ−1(ƒ(A)),
B⊆ƒ(ƒ−1(B))
are strict.
-
Lecture 4 (Thu, Jan 26):
Real numbers (cont.):
distributive law;
proof that 5+5=2⋅5 from the distributive law
and the "definition" of 2 as 1+1;
definition of a field - a set with operations addition
and multiplication that satisfy the addition axioms,
the multiplication axioms, and the distributive law;
Mini-Theorem 1: uniqueness of 0;
Mini-Theorem 2: 0⋅x=0 ∀x (see also Ross, Theorem 3.1(ii));
Mini-Theorem 3: uniqueness of the additive inverse to any x;
Mini-Theorem 4: the additive inverse to x is equal to (−1)⋅x
(see also Ross, Theorem 3.1(iii));
group work problems: (1) prove the uniqueness of 1 (hint: see the proof of Mini-Theorem 1),
(2) prove the uniqueness of the multiplicative inverse to any x≠0
(hint: see the proof of Mini-Theorem 3).
Reading:
Ross, Theorem 3.1 with proof (pages 15, 16).
FFT problems:
Ross, Sec. 3, Exercises 3.1, 3.2 (page 19);
Aksoy, problems 1.18, 2.6 (on pages 7, 23,
solved on pages 15, 29).
The complete Homework 2 is due on February 2 (Thursday).
-
Lecture 5 (Tue, Jan 31):
Real numbers (cont.):
remarks on Additional Problem 2 of Homework 2 on the importance
of the order in a mathematical statement, a magic trick based on this;
order structure (≤); order axioms; ordered fields;
properties of ordered fields (Theorem 3.2 of Ross);
absolute value |a|; distance dist(a,b)=|a−b| between numbers;
properties of absolute value (Theorem 3.5 of Ross)
- prove part (ii) yourselves, considering all cases
(a≥0, b≥0), (a≥0, b≤0),
and (a≤0, b≤0);
triangle inequality; corollary of the triangle inequality (Corollary 3.6 of Ross).
The Completeness Axiom:
max and min of a nonempty set (Def. 4.1 of Ross);
Example - max and min of the sets
(a) {-3/2, π, e, 2/5},
(b) [3,7),
(c) N,
(d) {r∈Q:r2≤2},
(e) {1/n:n∈N};
upper bound and lower bound of a nonempty set,
bounded above, bounded below, and bounded sets (Def. 4.2 of Ross);
Example (cont.) - upper and lower bounds of the sets (a)-(e);
least uppper bound (lub) or supremum (sup) of a nonempty set,
greatest lower bound (glb) or infimum (inf) of a nonempty set
(Def. 1.3.2 of Abbott);
Example (cont.) - sup and inf of the sets (a)-(e);
statement of Example 1.3.7 of Abbott.
Reading: Ross, pages 14-18; Abbott, pages 15-17.
FFT problems:
Aksoy, problems 2.2, 2.9, 2.10 (on pages 22, 23, solutions on pages 27, 31, 32);
Abbott, Exercises 1.3.1, 1.3.2 (page 18).
Just for fun:
The curious story of the infamous
Indiana Pi bill.
-
Lecture 6 (Thu, Feb 2):
The Completeness Axiom:
Axiom of Completeness (Ross, page 23);
example illustrating that the Completeness Axiom does not hold for Q;
Example: the supremum of the set c+A,
where c∈R, A⊆R,
is c+sup(A) (Abbott, Example 1.3.7);
Example: (s=sup(A)) ⇔
(∀ε>0 ∃ a∈A s.t. s−ε<a)
(Abbott, Lemma 1.3.8 - do the proof yourselves).
Consequences of Completeness:
the Nested Intervals Property (Abbott, Theorem 1.4.1);
the Archimedean Property (Abbott, Theorem 1.4.2; do the proof of part (ii) yourselves).
Reading:
Ross, page 23;
Abbott, pages 17, 18, 20, 21.
FFT problems:
Aksoy, problem 2.16 (on page 24, solution on pages 34, 35);
Abbott, Exercises 1.3.1(b), 1.3.2, 1.3.5, 1.3.8 (on pages 18, 19);
Ross, Exercise 4.1 (on page 26).
Here are the
solved exercises on logic and sets
that I gave you in class.
The complete Homework 3 is due on February 9 (Thursday).
-
Lecture 7 (Tue, Feb 7):
Consequences of Completeness (cont.):
group work: finding the suprema of the sets (5,7) and {1/n:n∈N};
density of Q in R (Abbott, Theorem 1.4.3).
Cardinality:
motivation of the need of a rigorous definition of a "number of elements in a set":
the set A={1,4,9,16,25,...} of squares of natural numbers
is a proper subset of N (i.e., A⊆N and A≠N),
but every number n∈N can be put into correspondence
with exactly one number n2∈A;
1-to-1 (injective), onto (surjective), and bijective functions (Abbott, Def. 1.5.1);
definition of when two sets A and B have the same cardinality (A∼B);
the interval (−1,1) has the same cardinality as R
as demonstrated by the function
ƒ:(−1,1)→R given by
ƒ(x)=x/(x2−1)
(Example 1.5.4 - figure out all details, i.e., show that ƒ is strictly monotone
by computing its derivative, then study the limits of ƒ as x tends to ∞ and −∞,
and use the Intermediate Value Theorem from Calculus, or find the explicit expression for the inverse function,
ƒ−1:R→(−1,1));
finite, countable, and uncountable sets (Abbott, Def. 1.5.5).
Reading:
Abbott, page 22, Example 1.5.3 on page 26.
FFT problems:
Abbott, Exercises 1.4.1, 1.4.2, 1.4.3, 1.4.4, 1.4.5, 1.4.6, 1.4.8 (on page 24);
Aksoy, problems 2.20, 2.27 (on pages 25, 26, solved on pages 36, 37, 39;
in problems 2.20 and 2.27, "neighborhood" of x∈R means
an open interval centered at x, i.e., an interval of the form
(x−ε,x+ε) for some ε>0);
if you have time, look at Aksoy, problems 2.14, 2.17
the solution of problem 2.14 is more complicated
- read it only if you have time, but do think about its meaning).
-
Lecture 8 (Thu, Feb 9):
Cardinality (cont.):
Q is countable, R is uncountable ([A] Theorem 1.5.6);
every set of a countable set is finite or countable ([A], Theorem 1.5.6, without proof);
a finite or countable union of countable sets is countable ([A], Theorem 1.5.8, without proof).
Cantor's Theorem:
the interval (0,1) is uncountable ([A], Theorem 1.6.1, proof using Cantor's diagonal argument);
power sets - definition and examples;
the power set of a finite set A with n elements
is 2n (this explains why sometimes the notation
2A is used to denote the power set
P(A) of a set A)
- a heuristic argument by constructing a bijection between the subsets of A
and the binary numbers consisting of n digits each of which takes value 0 or 1.
Reading:
Abbott, pages 27-29, 32-34.
FFT problems:
Abbott, Exercises 1.5.2, 1.5.3 (page 30),
1.6.1, 1.6.2, 1.6.3 (pages 32, 33);
Aksoy, problems 1.11, 2.8 (pages 6, 23).
The problems Aksoy 1.26 (page 8, solved on page 18) and Abbott 1.5.9 (page 31)
are more difficult, but very meaningful - think about them.
The complete Homework 4 is due on February 16 (Thursday).
-
Lecture 9 (Tue, Feb 14):
Cantor's Theorem (cont.):
Cantor's Theorem (Theorem 1.6.2) on no-existence of a surjective
function from a set A to its power set P(A);
discussion of equivalence classes of sets by their cardinality
(each class consists of sets of the same cardinality)
The limit of a sequence:
sequence - a function with domain N (or {0,1,2,3,...});
convergence of a sequences, limit of a convergent sequence;
discussion, elementary examples.
Reading:
Abbott, pages 34-35, 42-46.
Optional reading:
Abbott, Section 1.7, on deeper questions related to cardinality (pages 36-37).
FFT problems:
Abbott, Exercises 1.6.9, 1.6.10(a,b) (page 35),
2.2.2, 2.2.3, 2.2.4 (pages 47, 48);
Aksoy, problems 3.2, 3.5 (page 42).
-
Lecture 10 (Thu, Feb 16):
The limit of a sequence (cont.):
more examples;
uniqueness of limits ([A], Theorem 2.2.7);
divergent sequences.
The algebraic and order limit theorems:
bounded sequences;
every convergent sequence is bounded ([A], Theorem 2.3.2).
Reading:
Abbott, pages 46, 47, 49.
FFT problems:
Abbott, Exercises 2.2.5, 2.2.7 (page 48);
2.3.2, 2.3.3 (page 54).
-
Lecture 11 (Tue, Feb 21):
Exam 1
on Sections 1.1-1.6 of Abbott,
Section 3 and pages 20-23 of Section 4 of Ross,
covered in Lectures 1-8.
-
Lecture 12 (Thu, Feb 23):
The algebraic and order limit theorems (cont.):
Algebraic Limit Theorem ([A], Theorem 2.3.3, prove part (iv) yourselves);
Order Limit Theorem ([A], Theorem 2.3.4, prove parts (ii) and (iii) yourselves).
Reading:
Abbott, pages 50-54.
FFT problems:
Abbott, Exercises 2.3.2, 2.3.5, 2.3.6, 2.3.9, 2.3.10(a,c), 2.3.12(b) (pages 54, 55);
Aksoy, problem 3.15 (page 44).
The complete Homework 5 is due on March 2 (Thursday).
-
Lecture 13 (Tue, Feb 28):
The algebraic and order limit theorems (cont.):
example: proof that (an3+7)/5=8
directly from the definition of convergence
and by using the Algebraic Limit Theorem;
examples: proving that the sequences
(7n2−2)/(11n3),
7n2/(11n3+9),
7n2/(11n3−9),
(7n2−2)/(11n3+5n3/2−9)
converge to 0, directly from the definition of convergence.
The Monotone Convergence Theorem:
definition of increasing, decreasing, and monotone sequences;
Monotone Convergence Theorem ([A], Theorem 2.4.2);
recursively defined sequences;
Exercise 2.4.1: proof that the recursively defined sequence
x1=3,
xn+1=1/(4−xn)
converges and computation of its limit.
Reading:
Abbott, pages 56, 57, Exercise 2.4.1.
FFT problems:
Abbott, Exercises 2.4.2, 2.4.3, 2.4.5, 2.4.7 (pages 60, 61);
Aksoy, problems 3.3, 3.6 (page 42).
-
Lecture 14 (Thu, Mar 2):
The Monotone Convergence Theorem (cont.):
using the Monotone Convergence Theorem to find the resistance
of the infinite chain of resistors
where R=1Ω, by finding the limit of a recursively defined sequence;
expressing the resistance as a continued fraction:
golden mean
.
Subsequences and the Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem:
definition and examples of subsequences;
proof all subsequences of a convergent sequence converge to the same limit
as the original sequence (Theorem 2.5.2);
proof that lim(bn)=0 for b∈(0,1) (Example 2.5.3);
proving that a sequence is divergent by finding two subsequences
that converge to different limits or, equivalently, by finding a divergent subsequence (Example 2.5.4);
Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem (Theorem 2.5.5) - read the proof from the book,
using for inspiration the so-called Bolzano-Weierstrass method for catching
a lion in a desert.
Reading:
Abbott, pages 62-64.
FFT problems:
Abbott, Exercises 2.4.4*, 2.5.4*, 2.5.7
(the starred problems are mini-theorems and are more difficult);
Aksoy, problems 2.16 (page 24), 3.23, 3.24, 3.26 (pages 45, 46)
- the last three problems will help you understand the concepts
of limit superior and limit inferior (which can also be defined
in a way different - but equivalent - from the definition in Abbott
- see page 41 of Aksoy).
The complete Homework 6 is due on March 9 (Thursday).
-
Lecture 15 (Tue, Mar 7):
Subsequences and the Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem (cont.):
Newton's method for computing
roots of algebraic equation; the method converges quadratically - a
numerical example
of computing square root of 2 by using Newton's method;
proof of
Viète's formula
Wallis product
another interesting formula:
The Cauchy criterion:
definition of a Cauchy sequence;
an convergent ⇒
an Cauchy (Theorem 2.6.2);
an Cauchy
⇒ an bounded (Theorem 2.6.3);
an convergent ⇔
an Cauchy (Theorem 2.6.4).
Reading:
Abbott, pages 62-64.
FFT problems:
Abbott, Exercises 2.6.2, 2.6.3, 2.6.4(a,b), 2.6.5, 2.6.7(a,b)* (pages 70, 71)
(the starred problems are mini-theorems and are more difficult);
Aksoy, problems 3.7, 3.10, 3.11, 3.16 (pages 43, 44).
-
Lecture 16 (Thu, Mar 9):
Open and closed sets:
ε-neighborhood Vε(a)
of a point a∈R;
open intervals; examples of open set (the empty set, R, an open interval (c,d));
the union of an arbitrary collection of open sets
and the intersection of an arbitrary collection of open sets are open (Theorem 3.2.3);
limit point (accumulation point, cluster point) of a set;
a point x is a limit point of a set iff there exists a sequence
(an) in A with an≠x
such that lim(an)=x (Theorem 3.2.5);
isolated point of a set; closed sets;
a subset F⊆R is closed iff every Cauchy sequnce in F
converges to an element of F;
examples of closed sets; density of Q in R;
closure of a set.
Reading:
Abbott, pages 88-91.
FFT problems:
Abbott, Exercise 3.2.1;
Aksoy, problems 10.1, 10.2, 10.15, 10.16 (pages 198, 200);
∂A means the boundary of the set A (defined in Homework 7);
note that Aksoy calls "accumulation point" what we call "limit point",
and uses "limit point" with a different meaning (see the definitions
on page 197 of that book).
The complete Homework 7 is due on March 23 (Thursday).
-
Lecture 17 (Tue, Mar 21):
Open and closed sets (cont.):
a convenient characterization of the closure of A:
a belongs to the closure of A iff
∀ε>0
Vε∩A≠∅;
the closure of a set A is the smallest closed set containing A
(Theorem 3.2.12, without proof);
interior of a set - definition (see Exercise 3.2.14), examples;
the interior of a set A is the largest open set contained in A;
a set is closed iff it is equal to its closure,
a set is open iff it is equal to its interior;
an set is open iff it complement is closed,
an set is closed iff it complement is open (Theorem 3.2.13);
the union of a finite collection of closed sets is closed,
the intersection of an arbitrary collection of closed sets is closed
(Theorem 3.2.14).
Compact sets:
definition of a compact set;
definition of a bounded set;
a set is compact iff it is closed and bounded (Theorem 3.3.4).
Reading:
Abbott, pages 92, 93, 96, 97.
-
Lecture 18 (Thu, Mar 23):
Compact sets (cont.):
Nested Compact Sets Property (Theorem 3.3.5);
open covers, finite subcovers; examples of open covers;
Heine-Borel Theorem (Theorem 3.3.8).
Reading:
Abbott, pages 97-99.
FFT problems:
Abbott, Exercises 3.2.7(a), 3.2.8, 3.2.9, 3.2.14 (pages 94, 95);
3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.3, 3.3.4, 3.3.11 (pages 99-101).
The complete Homework 7a is NOT due on March 28 (Tuesday).
-
Lecture 19 (Tue, Mar 28):
Functional limits:
ε-δ definition of a functional limit; examples;
sequential criterion for functional limits (Theorem 4.2.3);
algebraic limit theorem for functional limits (Corollary 4.2.4);
divergence criterion for functional limits (Corollary 4.2.5);
examples.
Continuous functions:
ε-δ definition of continuity;
characterizations of continuity (Theorem 4.3.2);
criterion for discontinuity (Corollary 4.3.3).
Reading:
Abbott, pages 115-119, 122, 123.
FFT problems:
Abbott, Exercises 4.2.1(a), 4.2.4, 4.2.8, 4.2.10, 4.2.11.
-
Lecture 20 (Thu, Mar 30):
Exam 2
on Sections 2.2-2.6, 3.2, and 3.3 of Abbott,
covered in Lectures 9, 10, 12-18.
-
Lecture 21 (Tue, Apr 4):
Continuous functions (cont.):
algebraic continuity theorem (Theorem 4.3.4); examples;
continuity of a composition of continuous functions (Theorem 4.3.9).
Continuous functions on compact sets:
motivation: which properties of sets are preserved when the set is mapped
by a continuous function?
-
openness is not preserved - if ƒ:(−1,1)→R is defined as
ƒ(x)=x2, then ƒ((−1,1))=[0,1),
-
boundedness is not preserved - if ƒ:(0,1]→R is defined as
ƒ(x)=1/x, then ƒ((0,1])=[1,∞),
-
closedness is not preserved - if ƒ:R→R is defined as
ƒ(x)=1/(1+x2), then ƒ(R)=(0,1]);
preservation of compact sets (Theorem 4.4.1).
Reading:
Abbott, pages 123-126, 129, 130.
FFT problems:
Abbott, Exercises 4.3.2*, 4.3.3(b), 4.3.4, 4.3.7 (pages 126, 127).
The complete Homework 8 is due on April 11 (Tuesday).
-
Lecture 22 (Thu, Apr 6):
Continuous functions on compact sets (cont.):
preservation of compact sets (Theorem 4.4.1);
Extreme Value Theorem (Theorem 4.4.2).
Connected sets:
motivation of the concept of a connected set;
definition of separated, disconnected, and connected sets;
examples of disconnected and connected sets;
criterion for connectedness (Theorem 3.4.6, without proof).
Reading:
Abbott, pages 129, 130, 104.
FFT problems:
Abbott, Exercises 3.4.5, 3.4.6 (page 106); 4.4.6(a,c), 4.4.8, 4.4.11, 4.4.12 (pages 134, 135).
-
Lecture 23 (Tue, Apr 11):
The Intermediate Value Theorem:
the Intermediate Value Theorem (IVT) (Theorem 4.5.1);
preservation of connected sets (Theorem 4.5.2);
proof of the IVT by using the Axiom of Completeness;
proof of the IVT by using the Nested Intervals Property;
application of the IVT: proof of the existence of a root
of an algebraic equation;
application of the idea behind the proof of the IVT
by using the Nested Intervals Propert: the bisection method
for numerical computation of a root of an algebraic equation.
Derivatives and the Intermediate Value Property:
definition of the derivative of a function at a point;
differentiable functions;
example: computing the derivative of
ƒ(x)=xn for n∈N;
exercise: prove that ƒ(x)=|x| is not differentiable at 0.
Reading:
Abbott, pages 136-139, 148.
FFT problems:
Abbott, Exercises 4.5.1, 4.5.5 (pages 139, 140).
The complete Homework 9 is due on April 18 (Tuesday).
-
Lecture 24 (Thu, Apr 13):
Derivatives and the Intermediate Value Property:
a family of functions for constructing (counter)examples: for n∈{0,1,2,...},
define gn(x)=xnsin(1/x)
for x≠0 and gn(x)=0 for x=0:
-
g0 is discontinuous at 0;
-
g1 is continuous on R but not differentiable at 0;
-
g2 is differentiable on R but
g2' is discontinous at 0; ...
a function differentiable at a point a is continuous at a (Theorem 5.2.3);
derivatives of a sum, product, and ratios of two functions (Algebraic Differentiability
Theorem, Theorem 5.2.4, do the proof yourself);
Chain Rule (Theorem 5.2.5; proof optional);
Interior Extremum Theorem (Fermat's Theorem, Theorem 5.2.6);
Darboux's Theorem (Theorem 5.2.7).
Reading:
Abbott, pages 146-152 (proof of Theorem 5.2.5 optional).
FFT problems:
Abbott, Exercises 5.2.2, 5.2.3, 5.2.5, 5.2.6, 5.2.9 (pages 152-154).
-
Lecture 25 (Tue, Apr 18):
The Mean Value Theorems:
geometric motivation;
Rolle's Theorem (Theorem 5.3.1);
Mean Value Theorem (Theorem 5.3.2);
g'(x)=0 as a neccessary and sufficient condition for a differentiable
function g on an interval to be constant (Corollary 5.3.3);
ƒ'(x)=g'(x) implies that
ƒ(x)=g(x)+k for some k=const (Corollary 5.3.4);
the Generalized Mean Value Theorem (Theorem 5.3.5);
L'Hospital's Rule in the case 0/0 (Theorem 5.3.6).
Reading:
Abbott, pages 155-159.
FFT problems:
Abbott, Exercises 5.3.4(a), 5.3.5, 5.3.6 (page 161).
-
Lecture 26 (Thu, Apr 20):
The Mean Value Theorems (cont.):
proof that g'(x)>0 on an interval implies that the
g is strictly increasing (proof using the Mean Value Theorem);
food for thought: what can we conclude if
g'(x)≥0 on an interval?
A continuous nowhere-differentiable function:
a sketch of the ideas in the construction of such a function
by using the "sawtooth" function and of the Weierstrass function.
Rearrangement of infinite series:
an explicit rearrangement of the "alternating harmonic series"
1−1/2+1/3−1/4+1/5−1/6+1/7−1/8+...
that produces a sum equal to the half of the sum of the original series;
if a series is absolutely convergent, then any rearrangement of the series
converges to the same limit (Theorem 2.7.10, without proof);
Riemann rearrangement ("derangement") theorem:
if a series is conditionally convergent (i.e., convergent, but not absolutely convergent),
then for any chosen number there exists a rearrangement that converges to that number
(with an idea of the proof).
Uniform convergence of a sequence of functions:
definition of pointwise convergence of a sequence of functions (Definition 6.2.1);
example: the sequence (ƒn) of functions
ƒn:[0,1]→R
defined by ƒn(x)=xn
converges as n→∞ to the discontinuous function
ƒ(x)=0 for x∈[0,1) and ƒ(1)=1 (Example 6.2.2(ii));
definition of uniform convergence of a sequence of functions (Definition 6.2.1);
definition of pointwise convergence of a sequence of functions in ε-N terms
(Definition 6.2.1B).
Reading:
Abbott, pages 162-165, 39, 40, 75, 173-175, 177.
FFT:
OAThink about the subtle difference between the definition of pointwise convergence
and uniform convergence of a sequence (ƒn) of functions
ƒn:A→R
to a function ƒ:A→R:
-
(ƒn) converges pointwise on A to ƒ
if ∀x∈A ∀ε>0 ∃ N s.t.
|ƒn(x)−ƒ(x)|<ε
∀n≥N;
-
(ƒn) converges uniformly on A to ƒ
if ∀ε>0 ∃ N s.t.
|ƒn(x)−ƒ(x)|<ε
∀n≥N and ∀x∈A.
Notice, in particular, that in the first case N can depend on ε and on x,
while in the second case N can depend only on ε (i.e., the same N
should work for all x∈A).
Use this to prove that the sequence (ƒn)
of functions ƒn:[0,1]→R
defined by ƒn(x)=xn
converges pointwise, but not uniformly, on [0,1].
The complete Homework 10 is due on April 25 (Tuesday).
-
Lecture 27 (Tue, Apr 25)
Uniform convergence of a sequence of functions (cont.):
a detailed discussion of the concept of uniform convergence
of a sequence of functions (contrasted with the pointwise convergence);
statement and proof of the continuity of a uniformly continuous sequence
of continuous functions (Theorem 6.2.6).
Reading:
Abbott, pages 175-179.
The complete Homework 10a is NOT due on May 4 (Thursday).
-
Lecture 28 (Thu, Apr 27):
Exam 3
on Sections 4.2-4.5, 5.2, 5.3, and page 104 of Section 3.4 of Abbott,
covered in Lectures 19, 21-25.
-
Lecture 29 (Tue, May 2):
Uniform convergence and differentiation:
idea of the theorem guaranteeing the differentiability
of the limit of a sequence of functions (Theorem 6.3.1).
Series of functions:
pointwise and uniform convergence of a series of functions (Definition 6.4.1);
term-by-term continuity and term-by-term differentiability of the sum of
a series of functions (Theorems 6.4.2 and 6.4.3);
Weierstrass M-test (Corollary 6.4.5).
Power series:
derinition of a power series;
a power series converges on an interval (open, closed, on open on one side
and closed on the other), Theorem 6.5.1, radius of convergence;
pointwise convergence of a power series on a set A implies uniform convergence
on any compact K⊆A;
differentiting a power series (Theorem 6.5.7).
Reading:
Abbott, pages 184; 188, 189; 191; 194, 195.
-
Lecture 30 (Thu, May 4):
Taylor series:
Taylor series of a smooth function (Theorem 6.6.2, with a sketch of proof);
"Does the Taylor series of a smooth function converge to the function?"
- No: all coefficient in the Taylor series of the function
ƒ(x)=0 for x≤0
and ƒ(x)=exp(−1/x2) for x>0
computed from the formula in Theorem 6.6.2 are 0, but the function
is not identically 0 in any open interval containing 0;
truncating the Taylor series and approximating the function ƒ(x)
by a polynomial SN(x) of degree N,
remainder EN(x)=ƒ(x)−SN(x),
Lagrange's form of the remainder (Theorem 6.6.3);
applying the formula for the remainder to give an upper bound
on the error in approximating the function ƒ(x)
by a Taylor polynomial SN(x) of degree N;
proof of the Lagrange's formula for the remainder (using the generalized
Mean Value Theorem).
Just for fun:
explanation of the surprising fact that the Taylor series of
the function 1/(1+x2) - which can be obtained
by using the formula for the sum of a geometric series,
1/(1+x2)=1/[1−(−x2)]=1−x2+x4−x6+x8−...
(as well as the Taylor series of its antiderivative, arctan(x))
- converge only on (−1,1) by observing that 1/(1+x2)
has singularities at x=i and x=−i
in the complex plane C, so that the circle of convergence
of the Taylor series of 1/(1+x2) in C.
Reading:
Abbott, pages 199-202.
-
Final Exam:
Tuesday, May 9, 8-10 a.m., in 403 PHSC,
on the following material:
-
Sections 1.1-1.6 of Abbott, Section 3 and pages 20-23 of Section 4 of Ross, covered in Lectures 1-8;
-
Sections 2.2-2.6, 3.2, and 3.3 of Abbott, covered in Lectures 9, 10, 12-18;
-
Sections 4.2-4.5, 5.2, 5.3, and page 104 of Section 3.4 of Abbott, covered in Lectures 19, 21-25;
-
Section 6.2, covered in Lectures 26, 27 (only the concept of uniform convergence).
Good to know: